Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
1. Alner Greyl for CSM 11 - CSM should be open and friendly for players - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
Wasn't it CCP Leloo's job? Not a single thing about the game, or have I missed something?
- by JIeoH Mocc - at 2016.02.09 09:34:37
|
2. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Xander Phoena wrote: ..., I pushed hard ... I pushed hard this morning, mate ... you don't want to know what came out.
- by JIeoH Mocc - at 2014.11.25 17:12:35
|
3. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Zishy Linaris wrote: goodbye ccp. 12 accounts unsubbed as of now. i feel bullshitted for my time i invested but **** happens I've a feeling that, by this rate - this thread is going to account for more unsubbed characters than there were eve...
- by JIeoH Mocc - at 2014.11.25 17:08:16
|
4. Announcement:Dev Blog: Long-Distance Travel Changes Inbound - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Terrorfrodo wrote: The CSM seems to have been not nearly as involved in this as Greyscale wants us to believe, which is regrettable. Not really vOv
- by JIeoH Mocc - at 2014.10.02 10:17:00
|
5. Announcement:Dev Blog: Long-Distance Travel Changes Inbound - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Manfred Sideous wrote: Selexid wrote: Mark Hadden wrote: baltec1 wrote: I thought it was put in so the grr goon mob can celebrate for a while then kick up a stink when they realise we adapted to the change before it even hit tranq. w...
- by JIeoH Mocc - at 2014.10.02 08:19:00
|
6. Announcement:Dev Blog: Long-Distance Travel Changes Inbound - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Shojin Askulf wrote: baltec1 wrote: Deych wrote: Just do that every day. To the multiple attack points. Your ally members will be happy. And enemy caps will be there - they do not need to jump across the universe. We have for years. ...
- by JIeoH Mocc - at 2014.10.02 07:21:00
|
7. Announcement:Dev Blog: Long-Distance Travel Changes Inbound - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
galaxyexpress999 wrote: to the smaller , "poor" alliance that rely on one cap to jump around , this will be a major issue to the bigger , "controlling" alliance that just plant caps at certain places (farm / frontline / bear tears) , this chang...
- by JIeoH Mocc - at 2014.10.02 07:18:00
|
8. Announcement:Dev Blog: Long-Distance Travel Changes Inbound - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Bob Random wrote: Instead of ruining the game for everyone, how about coming up with a real solution like: Dunno how this ruins the game for everyone, I see plenty of people very exited with these changes... Maybe it ruins the game for som...
- by JIeoH Mocc - at 2014.10.02 07:10:00
|
9. Announcement:Dev Blog: Long-Distance Travel Changes Inbound - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
X Gallentius wrote: Antihrist Pripravnik wrote: You know what will be exceptionally fun? When renters figure out that their landlords have hard time keeping their own massive amounts of space together and decide to "change" the agreements a...
- by JIeoH Mocc - at 2014.10.02 07:07:00
|
10. Announcement:Dev Blog: Long-Distance Travel Changes Inbound - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Yep, like I said, do THAT every day. If you get two focal points, might be hard. But do ONLY THAT every day - it makes sense, right? Kasarch wrote: This "improvement" is a head shot for small roaming alliances, that must change their regroup ...
- by JIeoH Mocc - at 2014.10.02 06:45:00
|
11. Announcement:Dev Blog: Long-Distance Travel Changes Inbound - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Dave Stark wrote: Antihrist Pripravnik wrote: You know what will be exceptionally fun? When renters figure out that their landlords have hard time keeping their own massive amounts of space together and decide to "change" the agreements a b...
- by JIeoH Mocc - at 2014.10.02 06:42:00
|
12. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rowells wrote: X Gallentius wrote: 3. isk making opportunities outside of null sec need to be better than inside null sec. Otherwise, entities that have been thrown out of null sec will never be able to build up a strong enough army to compe...
- by JIeoH Mocc - at 2014.10.01 17:26:00
|
13. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ahaha, wow. And how do you propose to do that, in a game environment that doesn't have "coalition" as an entity? Would you prefer to see mega-alliances/corps (there were/are some already...)? Or just have small bodies being "friends" with one ano...
- by JIeoH Mocc - at 2014.10.01 17:06:00
|
14. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
knobber Jobbler wrote: JIeoH Mocc wrote: And yeah, i don't give a flying duck about how goons play, but when goons start to suggest self-serving mechanics changes ... I'd say it's a bit different from what you're presenting. It's not ju...
- by JIeoH Mocc - at 2014.10.01 16:40:00
|
15. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: First off, we can already wage a war from practically anywhere, we own half the space. How will having NPC stations suddenly make us more able to wage war? Did you notice what happened to PL when they lost the battle for B-...
- by JIeoH Mocc - at 2014.10.01 16:19:00
|
16. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Take the unbeatable fleets away from everyone and put in mechanics that makes taking and holding half of EVE impossible and you fix the problem. How's that related to the "letter" at hand, signed by all the stars of our blue ...
- by JIeoH Mocc - at 2014.10.01 12:09:00
|
17. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: KatanTharkay wrote: So no matter what, you want to be safe. Sadly, safety made this game boring. Well, I guess the only hope is that CCP will step in and make things unsafe for everybody, cause your proposal doesn't do that. ...
- by JIeoH Mocc - at 2014.10.01 11:54:00
|
18. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: JIeoH Mocc wrote: baltec1 wrote: Regatto wrote: All of these great Sov leaders were able to sign this open letter to CCP. I wonder why, they didn't just help themselfs and fix the game they broke. Why they didn't sign...
- by JIeoH Mocc - at 2014.10.01 11:38:00
|
19. The Null Deal: A Statement from Sovereign Nullsec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Regatto wrote: All of these great Sov leaders were able to sign this open letter to CCP. I wonder why, they didn't just help themselfs and fix the game they broke. Why they didn't sign simple deal that would bring pvp and d...
- by JIeoH Mocc - at 2014.10.01 11:29:00
|
20. Titan fair to bump or not? - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Gfy Trextron wrote: JIeoH Mocc wrote: Did you escalate your ticket to a Senior GM? Do it, if you haven't. Senior GM said you have our previous response and closed the ticket =(
- by JIeoH Mocc - at 2014.09.25 06:18:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |